Report
Peak oxygen uptake from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in wheelchair athletes
Can you predict peak oxygen uptake from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in trained wheelchair sportspersons?
- Lead academic:
- Professor Vicky Tolfrey
- Additional academics:
- Dr Keith Tolfrey, Tom Paulson
- Funder:
- The Peter Harrison Foundation
During periods of high intensity training, it may not be possible for all wheelchair sportspersons to complete a test to volitional exhaustion due to their concerns with the aggravation of a previous injury.
For that reason, predicting VO2peak from submaximal bouts of exercise may be welcomed if a test has to be terminated early. This study therefore assessed the validity of predicting VO2peak from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) obtained during submaximal wheelchair propulsion.
Methods
3 sub-groups of elite male wheelchair athletes (9 individuals with tetraplegia (TETRA); 9 with paraplegia (PARA); and 8 athletes without spinal cord injury (NON-SCI)) performed an incremental speed exercise test followed by graded exercise to exhaustion test (VO2peak) on a treadmill.
Main findings and applications
- Differentiated RPE may be used cautiously for TETRA and PARA athletes when predicting VO2peak across the RPE perceptual range of 9 to 15.
- It appears that central RPE and peripheral RPE mediate overall RPE similarly during wheelchair propulsion.
- However, predicting VO2peak using these methods is not recommended for the NON-SCI athletes due to the large coefficients of variation (16.8, 20.2 and 18.0%; RPEC, RPEP and RPEO, respectively).
Reference
Goosey-Tolfrey, V., Paulson, T.A.W, Tolfrey, K. and Eston R.G. (2014). Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion in trained wheelchair sportspersons. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 114(6): 1251-1258. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2850-9